Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:02:15 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: do i need ata with twe? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040201210117.44365C-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <E1AnRX3-000MDI-Bw@ran.psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Randy Bush wrote: > if i have sata with twe, and only have ata cdrom, > > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata0: [MPSAFE] > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > ata1: [MPSAFE] > fdc0: <NEC 72065B or clone> at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 > fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold > fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > acd0: CDROM <CD-224E> at ata1-master PIO4 > twed0: <Unit 0, TwinStor, Normal> on twe0 > twed0: 70910MB (145224064 sectors) > twe0: command interrupt > > how much of the ata kernel can i eliminate? can i cut down to > > # ATA and ATAPI devices > device ata > #device atadisk # ATA disk drives > #device ataraid # ATA RAID drives > device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives > #device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives > #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives > #options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering Yes. twe is a fully self-sufficient driver, and doesn't rely on the ATA driver framework. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040201210117.44365C-100000>