From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 1 14:39:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE7116A4CE for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 14:39:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from osiris.icrt.cu (osiris.icrt.cu [200.55.140.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F7643FE1 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 14:39:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carnero@icrt.cu) Received: from icrt.cu (neuromancer.icrt.cu [192.168.250.20]) by osiris.icrt.cu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hA1McwE31273 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:38:59 -0500 (CST) (envelope-from carnero@icrt.cu) Received: from WorldClient ([127.0.0.1]) (authenticated user texel@icrt.cu) by icrt.cu (icrt.cu [127.0.0.1]) (MDaemon.PRO.v6.8.4.R) with ESMTP id 64-md50000000884.tmp for ; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 17:40:36 -0500 Received: from [10.20.0.103] via WorldClient with HTTP; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 17:40:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 17:40:36 -0500 From: "Carlos A. Carnero Delgado" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Lowell Gilbert" , texel@icrt.cu Message-ID: X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.8.4 In-Reply-To: <44znfgszy2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <44znfgszy2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Authenticated-Sender: texel@icrt.cu X-Spam-Processed: icrt.cu, Sat, 01 Nov 2003 17:40:36 -0500 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 127.0.0.1 X-Return-Path: carnero@icrt.cu X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Machine locks in "Probing devices..." (4.9-RELEASE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: carnero@icrt.cu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:39:09 -0000 Hi, > > Is there a way for me to see what's locking up the probing? > > Looking at what's printed just before the lockup would help. > Posting it here might help even more. OK. Is there a way to capture that, or Pencil and Paper (TM) will do the trick? Thanks, Carlos.