From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 2 8:14:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45D214BD7; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 08:14:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo [192.67.166.79]) by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA02057; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 08:15:24 -0800 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 08:15:24 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Eivind Eklund Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven , Harlan Stenn , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bitkeeper license review In-Reply-To: <19991202153742.L76366@bitbox.follo.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, I only wanted to help see whether the BitKeeper licence is somehow usable for *BSD. The comments about SCCS are ill considered and not on point. This isn't a discussion as to whether CVS will be deepsixed. This is only a discussion about broadening tool support for *BSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message