From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 23:43:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C12B1065672; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barbara.xxx1975@libero.it) Received: from cp-out4.libero.it (cp-out4.libero.it [212.52.84.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435838FC17; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wmail47 (172.31.0.237) by cp-out4.libero.it (8.5.107) id 4C871C9D0088D4AB; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:43:49 +0200 Message-ID: <18672476.67591284594229837.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:43:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Barbara To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SenderIP: 82.57.159.180 Cc: autotools@freebsd.org Subject: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbara List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:43:51 -0000 About my previous mail, shouldn't the upgrade be handled by the entry in MOVED? Is it a portupgrade problem? Is the rebuild of ports like xmms or libX11 really necessary after a new version of autoconf? Thanks Barbara