From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 11 21:57:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail7.kscable.com (mkc-162-160.kc.rr.com [24.94.162.160]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E379A37B41A for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yahoo.com ([24.94.207.167]) by mail7.kscable.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:55:00 -0500 Message-ID: <3CB6692F.4060904@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:57:19 -0500 From: "JustinL. Boss" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Still not sure about STABLE and CURRENT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If I have a production server that needs to be up 100% of the time what do I use, current or stable. If it is stable then why when I compile my kernel with the stable source do it I get errors and with the current source everything seems to work well. If you do answer this question would you please explain why you answered the way you did. Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message