From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Sep 28 10: 8:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5435737B401 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 10:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.thundernet.cz (mail.thundernet.cz [62.77.87.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1560343E77 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 10:08:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: (qmail 6891 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2002 17:08:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freepuppy.bellavista.cz) (62.168.44.50) by mail.thundernet.cz with SMTP; 28 Sep 2002 17:08:28 -0000 Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C533D2FDAB2; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 19:08:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 19:08:26 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: named rejecting all kinds of serials Message-ID: <20020928170826.GY30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <19116172.1033221870@tot.in.t-online.fr> <200209281348.g8SDm0aQ085852@lurza.secnetix.de> <20020928151840.GV30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20020928095129.M24391@mail.seattleFenix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020928095129.M24391@mail.seattleFenix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG # benjamin@seattleFenix.net / 2002-09-28 09:51:29 -0700: > * Roman Neuhauser (neuhauser@bellavista.cz) [020928 08:19]: > > # olli@secnetix.de / 2002-09-28 15:48:00 +0200: > > > Bye the way, RFC 1912 is definitely recommended reading for > > > anybody who operates a name server or who is responsible > > > for zone files. > > > > Heh, RFC 1912 (and the others) are definitely recommended reading > > for anybody who operates the BIND name server, because these RFCs > > are very BIND specific. BIND is not DNS just like Sendmail is not > > SMTP. > > > > Your advice was actually very much to the point, Janine obviously > > runs BIND. I just find it hilarious that RFCs are a viable way of > > documenting an implementation (as opposed to a principle). > > Bind is the official reference implementation by which others are > measured. It makes plenty of sense to use Bind as the reference in > the RFCs. Bind is both principle and implementation. Nothing > hilarious about it. Would it make sense to use snippets from sendmail.mc in RFC 2821? RFCs should document protocols, configuration guides covering specific programs should be stored elsewhere. Zone files are not intrinsic to the DNS protocol. -- begin 666 nonexistent.vbs FreeBSD 4.7-RC 6:59PM up 11 days, 2:14, 12 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 end To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message