From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 17 21:00:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22E416A4DA for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:00:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2ED443D55 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:00:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from damaker@fillibach.de) Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CqdzK-0005Qt-00; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:00:38 +0100 Received: from pd9e29c5f.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.226.156.95] helo=localhost) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CqdzK-0001A4-00; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:00:38 +0100 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:00:35 -0000 To: "Kirill Ponomarew" References: <20050117152651.GN93155@voodoo.oberon.net> <20050117181811.GR93155@voodoo.oberon.net> From: "Konstantin 'Kosta' Welke" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050117181811.GR93155@voodoo.oberon.net> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54u1 (Linux, build 892) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:02be70226e3f6279351cb9cd6c3e2923 cc: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [SOLUTION] net/ns broken on FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:00:42 -0000 On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:18:11 +0100, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: >> Can you compile it with gcc 3.4.2? > Oh right, it fails also here, though pointyhat.freebsd.org didn't > build the package at all. There's a patch for gcc 3.4.x on the ns homepage but it does not solve our problems. Todays nightly build does compile throu, though, and seems to work fine. (I tested some examples and the automatic validation says everythings correct) Should we just use that nightly cvs build or should I try to figure out what to change in the release? greetings, Kosta