From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Jun  4 21:10:02 1995
Return-Path: bugs-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA17260
          for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jun 1995 21:10:02 -0700
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA17251
          ; Sun, 4 Jun 1995 21:10:01 -0700
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 1995 21:10:01 -0700
Message-Id: <199506050410.VAA17251@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: tom@haven.uniserve.com
Reply-To: tom@haven.uniserve.com
To: freebsd-bugs
Subject: bin/486: ls requires utmp.h?
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 4 Jun 1995 21:09:28 +0100
	<95Jun4.210941+0100_pdt.30755+3004@haven.uniserve.com>
Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


>Number:         486
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       ls includes utmp.h but doesn't use it
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs (FreeBSD bugs mailing list)
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Jun  4 21:10:01 1995
>Originator:     Tom Samplonius
>Organization:
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.0-BUILT-19950529 i386
>Environment:

  FreeBSD 2.0.X


>Description:

  print.c in /usr/src/bin/ls includes utmp.h but doesn't need to (I re-compiled with #include <utmp.h> commented out with no errors).  Is there is something
missing in print.c that used to require utmp.h?

>How-To-Repeat:

  Comment out #include <utmp.h> and re-compile.


>Fix:
	
  - remove #include <utmp.h>, or
  - fix whatever bit in print.c should be using utmp.h
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: