From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 16:02:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFACB795; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93CD1273A; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88302B93A; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:02:00 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Re: svn commit: r267961 - in head/sys: amd64/acpica amd64/amd64 amd64/pci amd64/vmm arm/arm arm/freescale/imx arm/xscale/ixp425 cam cam/ata cam/ctl cam/scsi cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern cddl/contrib/op... Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:43:26 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201406271633.s5RGXih6076565@svn.freebsd.org> <53AE3E42.7050606@selasky.org> <53AED837.8050702@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <53AED837.8050702@selasky.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201406301143.26218.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:02:00 -0400 (EDT) Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , Mateusz Guzik , Ed Maste , "src-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:02:01 -0000 On Saturday, June 28, 2014 10:59:03 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > FYI: > > Possibly the sysctl patches will not get MFCed, and be a FreeBSD-11 and > onwards only feature, even though the commit message states MFC after xxx. I suspect that that is probably for the best. Also, it would have been better to split out the other changes (like fixing mismatched tunables, etc.) into a separate commit from the CTLFLAG_TUN change. That makes reviewing them easier, and it also means you could more easily MFC just those fixes without pulling in the larger change. -- John Baldwin