From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 5 07:37:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F0016A4DA for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 07:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from obh.snafu.de (obh.snafu.de [213.73.92.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E28B43D46 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 07:37:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from ob by obh.snafu.de with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fy1x4-000HFC-1K for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:37:38 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:37:38 +0200 From: Oliver Brandmueller To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060705073737.GK90128@e-Gitt.NET> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20060704092127.GA55167@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <44AABBD9.4000603@samsco.org> <20060704214326.L64340@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uxuisgdDHaNETlh8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060704214326.L64340@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Oliver Brandmueller Subject: Re: NFS Locking Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 07:37:40 -0000 --uxuisgdDHaNETlh8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mornin' On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 09:47:21PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > BTW, I noticed yesterday that that IPv6 support committ to rpc.lockd was= =20 > never backed out. An immediate question for people experiencing new=20 > rpc.lockd problems with 6.x should be whether or not backing out that=20 > change helps. That could be a good pointer. I also started experiencing some problems=20 at home (I did not investigate further though, but started using local=20 locking and all was fine), while in our prod setup, where lots of=20 machines are running, and many of them use 6-STABLE of not too long ago,=20 I never experienced any problems with NFS. The main difference between=20 both these networks is, that at home I have an IPv6 environment, while=20 at work it's IPv4 only. I barely find time before the weekend to do tests, but if I don't read=20 any postings telling, that this made a difference, I will then start=20 testing at home. Thanx, Oliver --=20 | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | --uxuisgdDHaNETlh8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEq2xBiqtMdzjafykRApTRAJ0RkEUnbXgyQRuAFXUWolHNeCf9dgCgmA5N yMEORiK7q4DZNBSHXJym1pM= =mh4v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uxuisgdDHaNETlh8--