From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 20:03:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5943110656BE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:03:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4718FC1E for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: :LWgJfE6Id/4Sm/WkdV0gEbKL+/p/UjmosA/b4BPf1Ida/LA6f2WjvdsA Received: from athena.laverenz.de (77-22-194-90-dynip.superkabel.de [77.22.194.90]) by post.strato.de (mrclete mo39) (RZmta 18.15) with ESMTP id q00590l0UJ0rSg ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:03:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C0C127BF2; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:02:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21038-01-4; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:02:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.23.143] (unknown [192.168.23.143]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B15B127BF1; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:02:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49835D1D.6070504@laverenz.de> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:03:41 +0100 From: Uwe Laverenz User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa References: <20090130160750.GA15557@laverenz.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at laverenz.de Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem gdm 2.24, xdmcp D-BUS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:03:46 -0000 Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb: > gdm-2.24.1_5 is not broken, else I couldn't have logged onto my > gnome-desktop some minutes ago. But there are some feature-regressions Sorry, do you mean you logged into a _remote_ machine (via XDMCP) that is running GDM 2.24 and listens to UDP 177? Because this is the thing that doesn't work for us. When I said "broken", I meant that XDMCP does not work anymore (and a few other things that users were comfortable with). > compared to 2.20 - developers say they have rewritten important parts of > the code. Rewritten? Yes, that's what they call it these days when they remove features without getting the new stuff working. :-( Uwe