From owner-freebsd-security Wed Feb 21 18:34:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-53.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7014937B491 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:34:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 21AFF66F2E; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:34:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:34:47 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Michael Richards Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind problems Message-ID: <20010221183446.A64655@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <3A947710.000009.60978@frodo.searchcanada.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A947710.000009.60978@frodo.searchcanada.ca>; from michael@fastmail.ca on Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:18:56PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:18:56PM -0500, Michael Richards wrote: > Since the big BIND vulnerability, I checked all my versions of BIND=20 > to make sure they weren't the 8.2.2 variety. None were. >=20 > Most returned: named 8.2.3-T6B Thu Nov 23 19:00:06 EST 2000 > Which is not supposed to be vulnerable. Only in bizarro-world. Kris --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6lHrGWry0BWjoQKURAmhyAKCxf5kb5GYUwAmLm0tTUbJpXkOv8gCfSSVW 1nncD4DjyKkqBb99BD7Kwvw= =MWkA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message