From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 28 02:23:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA21496 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 28 Sep 1997 02:23:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp20.portal.net.au [202.12.71.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA21487 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 1997 02:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA05505; Sun, 28 Sep 1997 18:50:04 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199709280920.SAA05505@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Tony Overfield cc: Mike Smith , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INB question In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 28 Sep 1997 02:00:01 EST." <3.0.2.32.19970928020001.006ce080@bugs.us.dell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 18:50:03 +0930 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >Read it again. 1.3MegaWords. Specifically, implying that it's making > >1.3 million 16-bit I/O transactions per second, or 2.6MB/sec. > > > >Yes, this is substantially faster than I was expecting. 8) > > 16-bit ISA I/O cycles are not only wider but also faster than 8-bit ISA > I/O cycles. Back when IDE drives were still attached to the ISA bus, a > fast drive could transfer about 3.5MB/sec, but 2.5MB/sec or 2MB/sec was > more typical. The speed depends on the chipset and the way that the > BIOS programs the ISA timing options. Gotcha. Hmm, does this mean that you can read an 8-bit peripheral faster by using 16-bit cycles, or will the sizing signals trip you up? mike