Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 02:31:48 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Cc: jason@dstc.edu.au, grisha@verio.net, jesper@skriver.dk, hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: final state of mirroring ? Message-ID: <20010531093148.3F6623811@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20010526232449W.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan Hubbard wrote: > From: jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au> > Subject: Re: final state of mirroring ? > Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 14:50:05 +1000 (EST) [..] > > o what are the total services offered by / can be offered by the freebsd > > project to end users ? > > ftp and rsync seem to be about the most likely services that we can > offer and still have some form of security and sustainable "costs" in > terms of running each service. Not that even just these two are not > without cost. A running rsync invocation takes up a lot of memory, > as a small snapshot of ftp-master shows: > > 88649 ftp 2 0 13492K 13144K select 11:55 0.00% 0.00% rsync > 90604 ftp 2 0 19016K 18468K select 8:48 0.00% 0.00% rsync > 95678 ftp 2 0 19032K 18488K select 4:31 0.00% 0.00% rsync > 95775 ftp 2 0 19032K 18488K select 3:08 0.00% 0.00% rsync > > And that's about a third of the total rsync processes running. > I edited the list for brevity's sake. FYI: ftp-master has more ram now and had a few other loose ends tied up. It has a cvsupd running on it right now, but the configuration is still somewhat experimental and is not quite right yet. cvsup/cvsupd seem to be quite a bit less expensive to run than these rsync's. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010531093148.3F6623811>