From owner-svn-src-user@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 1 23:34:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-user@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB527933; Thu, 1 May 2014 23:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from d.mail.sonic.net (d.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ECC81A40; Thu, 1 May 2014 23:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zeppelin.tachypleus.net (airbears2-136-152-142-24.AirBears2.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.142.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s41NYjwE020385 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 May 2014 16:34:46 -0700 Message-ID: <5362DA15.4030409@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 16:34:45 -0700 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh , Chagin Dmitry Subject: Re: svn commit: r265187 - in user/dchagin/lemul/sys: amd64/linux amd64/linux32 compat/linux i386/linux References: <201405011402.s41E2lnv074130@svn.freebsd.org> <559801B7-3515-44C1-ABF4-2ED6D7F1A4F4@gmail.com> <20140501162640.GA19112@dchagin.static.corbina.net> <844C08D2-4660-456A-9DCE-62A47A411688@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <844C08D2-4660-456A-9DCE-62A47A411688@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Sonic-ID: C;OofGLYnR4xGd/pxB+Bh/TQ== M;AivsLYnR4xGd/pxB+Bh/TQ== Cc: src-committers , svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the experimental " user" src tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 23:34:54 -0000 On 05/01/14 15:13, Warner Losh wrote: > On May 1, 2014, at 10:26 AM, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > >> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:17:45AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >>> Re this and the signals changes: Are you sure that these values are identical on all linux ABIs? Last time I checked, there was substantial variation between arm, x86 and mips for these values. >>> >> They are all different. I know. We emulate only x86, not arm or mips. So what the reason to case about this platform? > The structure of the code is such that the other platforms can be added later. These changes make that harder than necessary when you could have move them to sys/x86 instead of making them fully MI. > > Anyway, just my humble feedback. I suspect we’ll get demand to support linux/arm64 binaries about this time next year based on the trajectories of the arm64 roll out... > > Warner I believe Peter Grehan also had (has?) a branch with Linux/powerpc compat in it. -Nathan