Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 20:53:30 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230023] [exp-run] Switch to use xorgproto instead of individual proto packages Message-ID: <bug-230023-7788-crB2oFOKme@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-230023-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-230023-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230023 Frank Reisert <bugs@rufus.in-berlin.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs@rufus.in-berlin.de --- Comment #26 from Frank Reisert <bugs@rufus.in-berlin.de> --- (In reply to Niclas Zeising from comment #25) Hello Niclas, sorry to bump in here just like that but I'm also hit by this=20 update. Following UPDATES (fortunately) not entirely to the dot I've run pkg version -l \? | cut -f 1 -w | grep -v compat | xargs pkg delete -n Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Deinstallation has been requested for the following 347 packages (of 0 pack= ages in the universe): ... 347 packages is much more than just the *proto stuff and goes down to=20 stellarium, minidlna, lumina-*, texlive-* etc. -- many of them not being=20 automatics. You will understand that mentioned procedure is a no-go in=20 this case. I won't have removed half the system in order to recompile it=20 afterwards -- I'm using ports, don't install packages via pkg. Please advise how to solve this in a less destructive way. Thank you! Kind regards Frank --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230023-7788-crB2oFOKme>