From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 25 18:40:04 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14E8106564A
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:40:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66188FC0A
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:40:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7PIe4U4050638
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:40:04 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7PIe4cs050637;
	Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:40:04 GMT
Message-Id: <201208251840.q7PIe4cs050637@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/170946: [patch] mark certain ports broken on ARM
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:40:04 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/170946; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
Cc: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>, dougb@FreeBSD.org,
	Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/170946: [patch] mark certain ports broken on ARM
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 13:32:51 -0500

 On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 05:06:11PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
 > Also, don't forget that package building runs are often done with
 > TRY_BROKEN, which is very helpful when doing !intel builds.
 
 Well, I wouldn't say "often" :-)  But yes, this is the distinction: whether
 or not we should even try to build it on the cluster in any circumstances.
 (e.g. if it has not yet been ported to that architecture, ONLY_FOR is
 the right thing AFAIC.)
 
 The errorlog URLs that I should have included (note that they are a bit
 disjoint):
 
   http://pointyhat-west.isc.freebsd.org/errorlogs/arm-errorlogs/e.9.20120812031641.pointyhat-west/index-category.html
   http://pointyhat-west.isc.freebsd.org/errorlogs/arm-errorlogs/e.9.20120818210612.pointyhat-west/index-category.html
 
 Finally, I wanted to use this PR as kind of a heads-up to maintainers
 that we had a new architecture up and going, so as to reduce the surprise.
 
 mcl