From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed May 30 7:50:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505D937B422 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 07:50:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michael.adler@compaq.com) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AFC6AAC76; Wed, 30 May 2001 10:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F6AAF4D; Wed, 30 May 2001 10:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4C117588; Wed, 30 May 2001 10:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vssad.hlo.dec.com (vssad.hlo.dec.com [16.128.112.187]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D828522; Wed, 30 May 2001 10:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from madler1.vssad.hlo.dec.com by vssad.hlo.dec.com (8.8.8/1.1.19.2/20Jul99-0349PM) id KAA0000031452; Wed, 30 May 2001 10:50:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010530104537.00b04950@vssad.hlo.dec.com> X-Sender: madler@vssad.hlo.dec.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 10:50:32 -0400 To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Matt Dillon From: Michael Adler Subject: Re: Preliminary Tuning man page (was Re: Benchmarking FreeBSD (was ...)) In-Reply-To: <200105252225.f4PMPXI44229@earth.backplane.com> References: <200105250638.XAA06408@hokkshideh.jetcafe.org> <200105251951.f4PJp1b42293@earth.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thank you for the tuning page! I and, I fear, others made the mistake of assuming that because SOFTUPDATES is in the kernel that it is automatically enabled for the disks. Nothing printed during boot leads me to believe otherwise and no mention was made of checking the flag using tunefs in /usr/src/UPDATING. My drives formatted with standard methods in the past had soft updates disabled. Perhaps there should be a message somewhere prominent encouraging people to check whether their drives really have soft updates enabled. It would also be useful if something during boot showed whether a mount would be using soft updates. -Michael To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message