From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 17 12:29:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C585106566C; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:29:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975168FC13; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DB3246B91; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:29:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.hudson-trading.com (unknown [209.249.190.8]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3B0528A076; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:29:38 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:08:50 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4A37A591.1070907@incunabulum.net> In-Reply-To: <4A37A591.1070907@incunabulum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906170808.51060.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:29:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: Vlad Galu , Bruce Simpson , Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Unnamed POSIX shared semaphores X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:29:40 -0000 On Tuesday 16 June 2009 10:00:49 am Bruce Simpson wrote: > Vlad Galu wrote: > > ... > > Thanks, Ivan. I'll take a better look at this after our first release, > > which is due in a couple of weeks. Right now the team efforts aren't > > focused on portability, so it's a low priority issue, but something > > we'd definitely like to have in the future. > > > > I've just run head first into this lack for a proof-of-concept I'm > looking at -- the lack of PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED support on FreeBSD. > > Are there any other references I can start working from? You can check the archives of threads@ where this has been discussed recently. -- John Baldwin