From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 15 16:58:43 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B4116A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:58:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BFA43F85
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:58:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	hAG0wfiF075136;	Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:58:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hAG0wf0U075135;
	Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:58:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:58:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <200311160058.hAG0wf0U075135@apollo.backplane.com>
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
References: <200311121855.hACItAaG006605@beastie.mckusick.com>
	<200311152159.hAFLx2mQ074474@apollo.backplane.com>
	<3FB6BA40.6B7B2FD8@mindspring.com>
cc: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@McKusick.COM>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure condidered harmful
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:58:43 -0000


:>     sense to do it.
:
:How do you propose to achieve POSIX compliance?  At the library
:level?  Or "not at all"?
:
:-- Terry

    I don't understand the question.  All that happens is that functions like
    fstat() and statfs() become libc functions rather then direct syscalls.
    The userland program doesn't know the difference, it uses fstat() and 
    statfs() just like it always has.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>