From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 13 01:39:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6C7DB16A4CE; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:39:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from daintree.corp.yahoo.com (daintree.corp.yahoo.com
	[216.145.52.172])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 576E143D2F; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:39:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
Received: by daintree.corp.yahoo.com (Postfix, from userid 2154)
	id 269881976E; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:39:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:39:40 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0411130037360.85716@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
	<200411131134.21189.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <200411131134.21189.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200411121739.40804.peter@wemm.org>
cc: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org>
cc: FreeBSD amd64 mailing list <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:39:41 -0000

On Friday 12 November 2004 05:04 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:17, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the patch at [1] gave me 8-10MB/s depending on direction ftping 1G
> > /dev/urandom data with the onboard NIC of my ASUS K8V SE Deluxe.
> >
> > This is the most I can get out of my 100Mbit/s consumer equipment
> > and local ftp machine I guess.
> >
> > Any feedback appreciated.
>
> Try something less CPU intensive like /dev/zero :)

I think he was saying he created a 1GB file from the contents 
of /dev/urandom and then timed the transfer of this over 100Mbit/sec 
link.

Anyway, the point was that it worked!  Could the problem with the K8V SE 
really be as simple as we've been hardcoding 128K of ram for a device 
that only has 64K?
-- 
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5