Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:39:40 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: FreeBSD amd64 mailing list <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs" Message-ID: <200411121739.40804.peter@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200411131134.21189.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0411130037360.85716@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <200411131134.21189.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 12 November 2004 05:04 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:17, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the patch at [1] gave me 8-10MB/s depending on direction ftping 1G > > /dev/urandom data with the onboard NIC of my ASUS K8V SE Deluxe. > > > > This is the most I can get out of my 100Mbit/s consumer equipment > > and local ftp machine I guess. > > > > Any feedback appreciated. > > Try something less CPU intensive like /dev/zero :) I think he was saying he created a 1GB file from the contents of /dev/urandom and then timed the transfer of this over 100Mbit/sec link. Anyway, the point was that it worked! Could the problem with the K8V SE really be as simple as we've been hardcoding 128K of ram for a device that only has 64K? -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411121739.40804.peter>