From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 2 23:09:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811931065670; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:09:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998338FC08; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id BAA07790; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:09:11 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RWcEA-000B7U-Rv; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:09:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4ED95A95.9040805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:09:09 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4ED8C0F1.807@FreeBSD.org> <20111202195555.GD1913@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20111202195555.GD1913@azathoth.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: again, ports that stop daemons X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:09:13 -0000 on 02/12/2011 21:55 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> >>> Or that they simply quit doing that and instead print a message like "Port X is >>> deinstalled but it may have some processes running, please do Y and/or Z to find >>> them and/or stop them". >> >> I prefer this suggestion. > > I also would prefer this. BTW, this part of my suggestion was inspired by the following: http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Zypper_usage_11.3#Check_processes Not sure how that feature is implemented though. -- Andriy Gapon