From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 19 00:57:36 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id AAA13613 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 00:57:36 -0800 Received: from iros1.IRO.UMontreal.CA (iros1.IRO.UMontreal.CA [132.204.32.21]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA13608; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 00:57:31 -0800 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by iros1.IRO.UMontreal.CA (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id DAA16658; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 03:57:01 -0500 Received: (from fortin@localhost) by zap.zap.qc.ca (8.6.9/8.6.6) id AAA09891; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 00:30:37 -0500 From: Denis Fortin Message-Id: <199501190530.AAA09891@zap.zap.qc.ca> Subject: Re: Reboots under 2.0-SNAP pppd (once again). To: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 00:30:36 -0500 (EST) Cc: bmk@dtr.com, questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <29092.790438235@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 18, 95 09:10:35 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 829 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I just upgraded my system to the latest snapshot on wcarchive. It seems > > now that some bugs may have crept back into the pppd code. > > This is weird! Why is nobody else reporting this? I'll look into it > as best I can.. I'm starting an upgrade of my home system to 2.0-950112-SNAP right now. I'll report on its relative stability with PPP tomorrow if all goes well. If all appears fine, I'll then upgrade our little gateway at work, which gateways between a pretty heavy PPP load + ethernet + 4 SLIP connections (and crashes twice daily with 2.0-RELEASE). I'll keep the list posted throughout this process if anything significant occurs. Stay tuned. -- Denis Fortin fortin@acm.org DMR Group Inc, (514) 877-3301 These opinions are my own