Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:04:22 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@sippysoft.com> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, bdrewery@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb + rrdmerge = *hiccup* Message-ID: <CAH7qZftYzi61cht2PftXHpcx7EBe73eKmLtoyTysN6H2sTXNcw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130817050318.GG34979@over-yonder.net> References: <20130817050318.GG34979@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, should be fixed already. Thanks for raising the flag. -Max On Aug 16, 2013 10:03 PM, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> wrote: > Hey guys, > > Since databases/rrdmerge showed up in ports, portupgrade seems to have > gotten a bit unhappy with INDEX: > > [Updating the portsdb <format:bdb_btree> [...] > /usr/ports/INDEX-8:19441:rrdmerge-0.0_b05d69bfac64: 0.0_b05d69bfac64: Not > in due form: '<version>[_<revision>][,<epoch>]'. > > (whether the version is itself malformed, or portsdb is being overly > retentive, I leave as an exercise to the readers ;) > > > -- > Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net > Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ > On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAH7qZftYzi61cht2PftXHpcx7EBe73eKmLtoyTysN6H2sTXNcw>