From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 27 19:45:31 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id TAA21228 for current-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 19:45:31 -0700 Received: from intercore.com (num1sun.intercore.com [205.198.76.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA21222 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 19:45:28 -0700 Received: (robin@localhost) by intercore.com (8.6.9/8.6.4) id WAA00685; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 22:41:19 -0400 From: Robin Cutshaw Message-Id: <199507280241.WAA00685@intercore.com> Subject: Re: SMC Ultra interrupt problem To: tom@uniserve.com (Tom Samplonius) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 22:41:17 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Tom Samplonius" at Jul 27, 95 07:41:35 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 449 Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > > On Thu, 27 Jul 1995, Robin Cutshaw wrote: > > > But why would it use irq 5? This seems like a bug to me. > > It has to use something. Since you haven't told it otherwise, it just > uses the default of irq 5. > What's the point in probing the card for it's config info if your not going to use it? This is one of my big problems with the commercial unix o/s's, you have to tell them config info that they can get themselves. robin