From owner-freebsd-gnome Sat Jan 19 8:51:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-28-046.nc.rr.com [66.57.28.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A3837B400 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:51:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (marcus@shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0JGoQZ46149; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 11:50:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Subject: Re: deskutils/gnomepim From: Joe Clarke To: Anders Andersson Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020119164923.GC20216@sushi.sanyusan.se> References: <20020119162813.GA25897@sushi.sanyusan.se> <1011458564.62255.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020119164923.GC20216@sushi.sanyusan.se> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 Date: 19 Jan 2002 11:51:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1011459073.62255.5.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 11:49, Anders Andersson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:42:43AM -0500, Joe Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 11:28, Anders Andersson wrote: > > > It seems that the expected result is inverted in gnomepim's Makefile. > > > > > > If I define WITHOUT_PILOT then it builds gnomepim with pilot support and > > > if I dont define WITHOUT_PILOT it happily builds without pilot-link and > > > so on. > > > > > > I will look at the Makefile to see if I have missed a studpid tweak or > > > not. > > > > You're absolutely right. The Makefile should read: > > > > .if !defined(WITHOUT_PILOT) > > BUILD_DEPENDS= > > ${X11BASE}/lib/gnome-pilot/conduits/libemail_conduit.so:${PORTSDIR}/palm/gnomepilot-conduits > > RUN_DEPENDS= > > ${X11BASE}/lib/gnome-pilot/conduits/libemail_conduit.so:${PORTSDIR}/palm/gnomepilot-conduits > > .endif > > > > But instead will add the depends when you _do_ define WITHOUT_PILOT. Of > > course, it goes on to do the right thing in other places, so this may > > break the port. > > > > The attached patch should fix things. > > Hah, I cant belive I missed that '!' > > I will try this and report back if I find any problems. The build will still fail since it looks like gnomepim ignores --without-pisock. I'm looking at it now. Joe > -- > Anders Andersson > UNIX, Networking and Security consultant > +46 (0)705 87 53 35 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message