Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:04:51 -0500 From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org> To: Jorn Argelo <jorn@wcborstel.com> Cc: youshi10@u.washington.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optimizationn questions? Message-ID: <707D1CE0-F7E3-4D29-A755-3AB7495FB66C@goldmark.org> In-Reply-To: <45F9C6ED.2010306@wcborstel.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0703142023180.6819@hymn03.u.washington.edu> <45F9C6ED.2010306@wcborstel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 15, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Jorn Argelo wrote: > youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Danny Pansters wrote: >> I know that this has been discussed a few times before, but >> IMO running a slightly stripped down kernel (i.e. custom, not >> GENERIC) actually proves to be helpful in increasing boot times >> (if options were added statically) and compile times if [(# of >> options added) < (# of options in GENERIC)]. > I can confirm this too. I noticed on both desktop and servers the > boot time can be decreased by stripping the kernel configuration of > stuff you don't need. I don't have any hard facts to prove this but > this is what my personal experience is. me, too. -j
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?707D1CE0-F7E3-4D29-A755-3AB7495FB66C>