From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 23:25:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A4416A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oz@nixil.net) Received: from nixil.net (nixil.net [161.58.222.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DDE13C46A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oz@nixil.net) Received: from demigorgon.corp.verio.net (fw.oremut02.us.wh.verio.net [198.65.168.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by nixil.net (8.13.6.20060614/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0NNDBax026286 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:13:18 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4797CA07.1020203@nixil.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:13:11 -0700 From: Phil Oleson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nixil.net [161.58.222.1]); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:13:18 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/5056/Sun Dec 9 03:55:13 2007 on nixil.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: procedure for removing a port from the tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:25:12 -0000 Hey.. I am looking for the procedure for removing a port I submitted and maintain a while back. As I cannot see anything in the porter's handbook, I'm asking here. The specifics are I want to nuke devel/libdnsres from the tree. I was playing with it in a project of my own a while back and wanted a way to track it. It is a dns library that overlays libevent to provide dns resolution. Honeyd used to depend on it as well, but as libevent gained an official dns layer of it's own (similar but different implementation), it's need of the library went away. So did my own need of it. So, I can keep it on my list of ports I maintain, though it has been orphaned by it's creator at this point, so it's a no-opt for me. But I'd rather just have it marked for removal. Suggestions? (documentation in the handbook would be nice as well) -Phil.