From owner-freebsd-java Thu Feb 21 23:57:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (zaphod.euronet.nl [194.134.128.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8151A37B400 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:57:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ernst@localhost) by zaphod.euronet.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1M7vZr58109; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:57:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ernst) Message-Id: <200202220757.g1M7vZr58109@zaphod.euronet.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ernst de Haan To: Michael Gratton Subject: Re: Port www/jakarta-tomcat refactored Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:57:35 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200202212033.g1LKXv256350@zaphod.euronet.nl> <3C758264.5090205@vee.net> In-Reply-To: <3C758264.5090205@vee.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Michael, Yes, because mod_jk is based on it. I believe in gradual change. I will upgrade the port to 3.3 soon, just have to find some time to test the *current* port with mod_jk first... Ernst On Friday 22 February 2002 00:27, Michael Gratton wrote: > Ernst, > > Ernst de Haan wrote: > > Any comments on the new version would be more than welcome. Just make > > install (or portupgrade) after a cvsup :) > > Out of curiosity (and because I must have missed the original > discussion), is there a reason the port is based on 3.2.x rather than > 3.3.x? > > I would have though that the vastly improved classloading scheme alone > would have made it worthwhile, even if 3.3 wasn't the offical stable 3.x > version. > > Thanks, > Mike. -- Ernst de Haan EuroNet Internet B.V. "Come to me all who are weary and burdened and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message