From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 05:02:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A1A37B401 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 05:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1172E43FBF for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 05:02:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leimy2k@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h4QC260x029056 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 05:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mac.com (adsl-33-229-251.jan.bellsouth.net [67.33.229.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h4QC1ZY3018041; Mon, 26 May 2003 05:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 07:01:34 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) To: "Matthew N. Dodd" From: David Leimbach In-Reply-To: <20030525202140.Y86964@sasami.jurai.net> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: Preliminary ELF prebinding patches available. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 12:02:07 -0000 On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 07:33 PM, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Sun, 25 May 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >>> I was more concerned with simplicity; the method I use solves the >>> problem >>> with minimal effort and complexity. The combination of time() + >>> random() >>> + filename will not collide on a single box. >> >> But it can across NFS, right? > > Uh... If you want to share /var/db/prebind via NFS I suppose you can. > I'm not sure how a practical NFS environment would result in a greater > chance of collisions. Regardless, there is no real penalty for > collisions > (other than prebinding not being available for that executable.) > Diskless cluster nodes is a practical NFS configuration involving the sharing of basically everything.