From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 28 00:06:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA18235 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:06:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA18153 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:06:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA21873; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 08:05:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199807280705.IAA21873@awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: ben@rosengart.com cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: more PPP weirdness In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 27 Jul 1998 18:34:05 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 08:05:32 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG All the W routes are cloned routes. In theory, these routes disappear when the route they were cloned from disappears. If you add delete ALL add default HISADDR to your ppp.linkup, does that fix the problem ? I think the problem *may* be that a ``changed'' route isn't fixing the routing table in the way that a ``deleted'' then ``added'' route is. > PPP ON narcissus> show route > Destination Gateway Flags Netif > default 204.180.194.101 UGSc tun0 > 10/8 link#1 UC ed0 > 18.23.0.16 204.180.194.101 UGHW3 tun0 > 38.180.208.198 204.180.194.101 UGHW3 tun0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH lo0 > 128.10.11.72 204.180.194.101 UGHW tun0 > 128.193.76.12 204.180.194.101 UGHW3 tun0 > 137.22.4.31 204.180.194.101 UGHW3 tun0 > 141.117.1.117 204.180.194.101 UGHW3 tun0 > 152.1.2.118 204.180.194.101 UGHW3 tun0 > 152.1.9.90 204.180.194.101 UGHW3 tun0 > 164.107.115.3 204.180.194.101 UGHW3 tun0 > 198.67.15.2 204.180.194.101 UGHW tun0 > 199.184.165.2 204.180.194.101 UGHW tun0 > 204.180.194.101 204.180.205.197 UH tun0 > 206.137.222.89 204.180.194.101 UGHW3 tun0 > > netstat -rn reports my routing tables as being quite normal. Now, I may > be misunderstanding, but it looks like PPP is seeing all these hosts as > gateways, in which case no wonder it's getting confused. When I grabbed > this table from PPP, it was "up" but no packets were getting anywhere. > I down'd and quit and dialed again, and now PPP works, but: > > PPP ON narcissus> show route > Destination Gateway Flags Netif > default 204.180.194.101 UGSc tun0 > 10/8 link#1 UC ed0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH lo0 > 198.67.15.2 204.180.194.101 UGHW tun0 > 199.184.165.2 204.180.194.101 UGHW tun0 > 204.180.194.101 204.180.205.197 UH tun0 > > The gateways are growing again. Perhaps this is completely normal, and > I'm misunderstanding something? Or perhaps there's just a flipped bit > somewhere, since the only PPP-related host route not marked as a gateway > is -- my gateway. > > > Ben > > "You have your mind on computers, it seems." > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message