Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:19:33 -0700 From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS l2arc and HAST ? newbie question Message-ID: <AANLkTinbLi8NnZPmWFeW2t0YgGxevTRnNy-9vJYKLG3H@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100615181258.GO87112@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <4C177E69.3020204@gibfest.dk> <20100615155348.GA1922@garage.freebsd.pl> <20100615181258.GO87112@cicely7.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>wrote: > Pawel, do you know if there is any chance that ZFS can boot with warm > L2ARC? It is mentioned in several articles, but my system starts with empty > cache. My system is already quite old, so probably it is already in. > There's been nothing mentioned about it on the zfs-discuss mailing list, and I haven't seen it blogged about or mentioned in the changelogs for ZFSv14+, so I don't think this has been implemented in ZFS yet. I'm very interested to hear about your results with HAST/ZFS combo > because I have a possible use case. I've only used it in testing via VirtualBox so far. Our intended use is to create a fail-over storage network (1 server at building A, 1 server at building B, connected via gigabit fibre) for a virtualisation setup. In testing inside VirtualBox, it works nicely. Just waiting for our fibre link to go live to test it on real hardware. :) -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinbLi8NnZPmWFeW2t0YgGxevTRnNy-9vJYKLG3H>