From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 16:42:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86DB1065672; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21B81511FF; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E91CEF4.9090600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 09:42:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Fonvieille References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> <4E8F0AA2.3020704@freebsd.org> <4E8F8873.4030006@FreeBSD.org> <20111008090351.GA1960@emphyrio.blackend.org> <4E91A867.9060905@FreeBSD.org> <20111009153343.GC2006@emphyrio.blackend.org> <4E91CDB1.3070304@FreeBSD.org> <20111009164154.GA3819@emphyrio.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <20111009164154.GA3819@emphyrio.blackend.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org, doceng@FreeBSD.org, Gavin Atkinson , Gabor Kovesdan , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?n?= , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlei?=, Rene Ladan Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 16:42:47 -0000 On 10/09/2011 09:41, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:37:05AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 10/09/2011 08:33, Marc Fonvieille wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >>>> On 2011.10.08. 11:03, Marc Fonvieille wrote: >>>>> And before doing the change, some things should >>>>> be done: complete separation between release docs and doc/ >>>> Or maybe complete integration? Once we are in SVN we can branch release >>>> docs even if we do not branch the rest to make it easy for translators. >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>> >>> It's obvious that your point of view can also be defended, but the aim >>> from src point of view is to be able to build a release without the need >>> of a doc tree. >> >> If there isn't already a knob to avoid building the docs in the new >> release building system (like there was in the old one) then there >> certainly should be. >> > > By "release" I meant "release bits + its release docs". Yes, I understood what you meant. What I'm saying is that what you see as a bug, I see as a feature. >> Meanwhile, one of the virtues of having doc and src in the same svn repo >> is the ability to have one canonical version of the documentation. >> > > -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/