Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:41:49 +0200 From: Jakub Klama <jakub.klama@uj.edu.pl> To: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Refactored interrupt handling on ARM Message-ID: <167c8a4b580fff7e4f1a85edfa962dd6@uj.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <534D4A01.2020804@freebsd.org> References: <3e7f866f4bc774975ae3c85e0df78ec2@uj.edu.pl> <53418D13.7030107@freebsd.org> <534C0F48.2090302@freebsd.org> <f2bebfa812ecb70f423b6be4779b217b@uj.edu.pl> <534C5A6A.1090707@freebsd.org> <246c2ef842c2b47eb2400c1f700ad441@uj.edu.pl> <534CC733.7010009@freebsd.org> <ACD52C94-A44A-42FD-8016-61B0B21B12D9@bsdimp.com> <534D4A01.2020804@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:02:25 -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On a related note, I'm confused by the simplebus.c changes. > machine/fdt.h isn't an MI header (it doesn't exist on PowerPC, for > example). Neither is FDT_DESCRIBE_IRQ() an MI interface. If you want > an interface like this, it seems like it should be a standard part of > the MI interrupt layer rather than yet more hacks in simplebus. Right. I was not aware of machine/fdt.h obsolescence. Jakub
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?167c8a4b580fff7e4f1a85edfa962dd6>