Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:38:52 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: Stanley Hopcroft <Stanley.Hopcroft@IPAustralia.gov.au>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SSH and/or Kerberos experience Message-ID: <20010622073852.A8633@hellblazer.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <2323.993202300@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>; from sheldonh@starjuice.net on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:31:40AM %2B0200 References: <20010622100034.B788@IPAustralia.Gov.AU> <2323.993202300@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:31:40AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > Use both, in other words, Kerberized SSH. Kerberos scores you > ticket-based authentication, while SSH scores you an encrypted session. Of course, Kerberized applications (e.g. TELNET) typically also use encryption of the data stream. Currently SSH offers more algorithms for this, though. Personally I use all three of Kerberized SSH, TELNET, and FTP, depending upon what I want to accomplish. I find SSH very convenient as an rsh/rcp replacement; I prefer TELNET's terminal handling; I find FTP best for large transfers and remote file management. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010622073852.A8633>