From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon May 29 18:35:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mailgw1.netvision.net.il (mailgw1.netvision.net.il [194.90.1.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FD937BA15; Mon, 29 May 2000 18:35:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ak@freenet.co.uk) Received: from freenet.co.uk (RAS1-p112.rlz.netvision.net.il [62.0.168.114]) by mailgw1.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA15726; Tue, 30 May 2000 04:35:25 +0300 (IDT) Message-ID: <39332AA1.AB94FE80@freenet.co.uk> Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 05:42:41 +0300 From: A G F Keahan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Suggestion for removing VMware 1.1 port References: <86puq5w6hw.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I still care about it. It works fine for me, and I don't see any good reasons to upgrade to 2.0. I think that as long as it's possible to get it from VMWare.com, the port should stay. If you don't want to maintain it, I can do it (I'm also maintaining audio/krio). Alex Keahan Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > > Now that noone seems to care about VMware 1.1 (neither do I), and > almost two months have passed since VMware 2.0 product was released > (on 3 March), why not we remove the emulators/vmware port? > > Admittedly, I myself have no intention of maintaining it anymore, or > been having none for long, rather. ;) > > Now someone might give his/her name as maintainer of the port to take > it over, or I will remove it around 3 June. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message