Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:15:17 +0200 (CEST) From: User Wojtek <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, rozhuk.im@gmail.com Subject: Re: proper newfs options for SSD disk Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205221914450.61179@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205220731070.51493@wonkity.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205182209010.9350@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4fb7dfd6.736a980a.186d.ffff902f@mx.google.com> <20120519180901.GA1264@tiny> <4fb7e819.6968700a.7a7f.ffff9153@mx.google.com> <20120522061734.GA1210@tiny> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205220731070.51493@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> What is wrong with this procedure? > > The filesystem partitions end up at locations that aren't even multiples of > 4K. This can reduce performance. How much probably depends on the SSD. well in my case it is a multiply of any number you like [root@wojtek ~]# bsdlabel ada0 # /dev/ada0: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 117231408 0 4.2BSD 0 0 0 c: 117231408 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1205221914450.61179>