Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:09:51 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: arp-v2 has been committed Message-ID: <495B1ABF.4080302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4302B1CAC5@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> References: <20081227202117.F3B14341A3@cavin02.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be><200812281613.49404.tijl@ulyssis.org> <alpine.LSU.1.99.0812290925070.23595@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4302B1CAC5@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Li, Qing wrote:
> I don't think we can provide binary compatibility without putting
> back RTF_LLINFO exactly as it was. My preference is to continue down
> the new path without RTF_LLINFO.
Out of curiosity, what's your reasoning for this decision? If I've
missed this explanation previously, my apologies.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?495B1ABF.4080302>