From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 16:25:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5BC3F6D; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34C81F85; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.31.9.154] (unknown [213.225.137.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDD843BAA; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:25:26 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5405EF6B.6040301@marino.st> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:25:15 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Weinberger , marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r367002 - head/devel/cmake References: <201409021339.s82DdX36038975@svn.freebsd.org> <5405E33B.3040906@marino.st> <5405E50B.1030100@marino.st> <30FDC48D-0DF1-4EBA-918D-878048101E21@adamw.org> <5405E675.1090509@marino.st> <1C547D2C-011A-41A6-AA9D-891A056DD87A@adamw.org> <5405EC34.8070507@marino.st> <57AEDB52-B216-4048-AE95-4BD8E15494DC@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <57AEDB52-B216-4048-AE95-4BD8E15494DC@adamw.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" , Raphael Kubo da Costa , Andrej Zverev , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:25:39 -0000 On 9/2/2014 18:20, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On 2 Sep, 2014, at 12:11, John Marino >> >> All this hinges on *if* it is indeed a policy. If it is, it should >> be enforced. > > Okay well, until you’re finished writing up your new policy, can we > make an option to prevent bringing in a dozen unneeded dependencies? That's a pretty unfair statement to make. I never claimed it's my policy, only that's what I had been told in #bsdports. On this particular case, these are a dozen "light" dependencies so if you asking me to vote on it, I say sphinx is not worthy of an exception, honestly. The whole set builds in a couple of minutes as I recall. You are make it a much bigger deal that it really is, especially given that these dependencies are most likely already present due to other ports having required them. John