Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jun 2002 22:11:47 +0200
From:      Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net>
To:        Michael Meltzer <mjm@michaelmeltzer.com>
Cc:        Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au>, freebsd stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: unable to alias more than 1 ip address in a subnet
Message-ID:  <20020625201147.GB11513@gits.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <004d01c21c63$5ce70820$34f820c0@ix1x1000>
References:  <200206242356.JAA12574@lightning.itga.com.au> <20020625003023.GA2654@gits.dyndns.org> <004d01c21c63$5ce70820$34f820c0@ix1x1000>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:14:20PM -0400, Michael Meltzer wrote:
> I know this might have come up, but is their any reason that the netmask on
> a alias would not be 255.255.255.255. ?
> 
> Its very unintuitive right now. To the point of sentencing many to
> frustration. I would subject a message from ifconfig with -alias && netmask
> !255.255.255.255
>     "Warning: for an -alias most likely your netmask should be
> 255.255.255.255, see ifconfig(8), use -s to turn warning off".

for instance, ifconfig(8) doesn't say anything about netmasking
.255 for aliases.

in fact, I'm just noticing that .0 works 'til a few week (month?),
but not anymore. so, the machine hung whenever I try to start
netscape w/o touching anything. until yesterday, I guessed it was
the fault to netscape (-linux) or linux_base while in fact, it's
something else. in other words, this is anoying a lot.

PS : could someone try netscape-linux (4.79) w/ a proxy to a wrong
IP addr to see if the machine also hang ?

Cyrille.
-- 
Cyrille Lefevre                 mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020625201147.GB11513>