From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 20:22:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8C11065670 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00888FC14 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1A31056172; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:22:46 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:22:46 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Arnaud Lacombe Message-ID: <20120125202246.GA26447@lonesome.com> References: <20120125072809.GA11115@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:38:27 +0000 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:22:47 -0000 On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:58:41AM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > > You seem to be obsessed by picking over > > semantics and finding shortcomings to be aggreived over. > > > Semantics and proper, independent, API are crucial. I'm talking about the semantics of the non-technical part: the wording of things that people post in email. viz: the time-wasting nonsense about "oh, it seems to be released already, has anyone noticed?" from a few weeks ago. It was 100% FUD, which apparently you knew perfectly well at the time, and thus AFAICT only posted it to draw attention to yourself. That's the drama I'm talking about. mcl