From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 23:43:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1AB9A263C; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from vps.amdmi3.ru (vps.amdmi3.ru [109.234.38.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E976C18EF; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from hive.panopticon (unknown [78.153.152.119]) by vps.amdmi3.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C28AB0614; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:42:52 +0300 (MSK) Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32]) by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A248583; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:40:54 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90B8180B77; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:39:32 +0300 (MSK) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:39:32 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r392209 - in head/devel: . p5-Minilla Message-ID: <20150715233932.GF6337@hades.panopticon> References: <201507152017.t6FKHElA056017@svnmir.geo.freebsd.org> <20150715204943.GK97479@hades.panopticon> <1F084648031C9C61AABC041D@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1F084648031C9C61AABC041D@atuin.in.mat.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:43:01 -0000 * Mathieu Arnold (mat@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > |> | +RUN_DEPENDS:= ${BUILD_DEPENDS} > |> > |> Please, do *not* use := for depends, it is wrong. > |> |> tml> > | > | First, mail submitter, not me. > > I'm sorry, but no, you are the one committing it, thus, you are responsible > for it to be up to our standards. Yes, and I see nothing wrong with it. > | Next, handbook doesn't say anything against :=. > > That is right, but the handbook tells you to do something else, that is, > use a third variable, I'll add a bit about never using := tomorrow. The way it is now it's nothing more than a mere suggestion. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://amdmi3.ru