From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 7 7:59:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zeus.theinternet.com.au (zeus.theinternet.com.au [203.34.176.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AB7150D9 for ; Fri, 7 May 1999 07:59:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from akm@zeus.theinternet.com.au) Received: (from akm@localhost) by zeus.theinternet.com.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) id AAA64981; Sat, 8 May 1999 00:59:04 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from akm) From: Andrew Kenneth Milton Message-Id: <199905071459.AAA64981@zeus.theinternet.com.au> Subject: Re: Stability concerns in latest -STABLEs. In-Reply-To: from Chuck Youse at "May 7, 1999 10:41:30 am" To: cyouse@cybersites.com (Chuck Youse) Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 00:59:04 +1000 (EST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG +----[ Chuck Youse ]--------------------------------------------- | | these isolated incidents? Stated differently, are others out there | running 3.1-STABLE on production servers in relatively | filesystem-intensive, sustained load situations who can put my mind at | ease? I can't really talk about SMP much, but, I've got a P200 running as a dialin server + web proxy using vinum and softupdates using 3.1-stable updated every month or so. The proxy takes about a million hits per week, and I've not really had any problems at all. -- Totally Holistic Enterprises Internet| P:+61 7 3870 0066 | Andrew The Internet (Aust) Pty Ltd | F:+61 7 3870 4477 | Milton ACN: 082 081 472 | M:+61 416 022 411 |72 Col .Sig PO Box 837 Indooroopilly QLD 4068 |akm@theinternet.com.au|Specialist To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message