Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:05:18 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Meta: explain what where when? (was Re: userland access to devices is moving!) Message-ID: <42799.1055963118@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:00:32 CDT." <20030618190032.GG10127@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030618190032.GG10127@over-yonder.net>, "Matthew D. Fuller" writes: >> I do on the other hand not think that emails to arch@ is the best forum >> for the in-depth explanations. > >Oh, absolutely! And to understand an in-depth explanation, I'd have to >dig into the code anyway to understand it. > >I was aiming more at a throwaway statement like, "This will clean up a >lot of code and make it easier to understand and debug," or [...] Ahh, ok. Yeah, I guess we have a tendency to write with the usual suspects as implied target. I'll try to remember that. >> The "blueprint" articles which I am trying to restart in DĉmonNews >> may not be either, but I think they are more the right kind of >> forum for it. I am still warming up to the article format, and the >> amount of feedback so far has not really given me any feel for how >> complex issues I can tackle without the readers just skipping the >> article. > >That's an interesting way to go, and certainly something worthwhile. >Poking at the site now, I see the one from May on userland/kernel >interfaces; has there been more? I hope the next one is in the pipeline... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42799.1055963118>