From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 29 11:26:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED90816A421 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.lists@fsck.ch) Received: from secure.socket.ch (secure.socket.ch [212.103.70.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41D113C447 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.lists@fsck.ch) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=secure.socket.ch) by secure.socket.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1I4E1T-000J2a-U7; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:48:24 +0200 Received: from 62.2.233.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user roth@fsck.ch) by secure.socket.ch with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:48:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59854.62.2.233.2.1183114099.squirrel@secure.socket.ch> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:48:19 +0200 (CEST) From: freebsd.lists@fsck.ch To: "Minseok Choi" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "secure.socket.ch", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: -- snip bind question -- And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE? I don't want to be picky, but asking bind questions on bind-specific mailing lists and not somewhere else is helpful to everybody. After all, someone else might have the same problem as you, and he/she probably won't search for bind-related problems on a FreeBSD list, thus not finding any helpful answers that might be given to you here. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys Identified Mail: policy says domain signs some mails X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: freebsd.lists@fsck.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on secure.socket.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND Configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:26:24 -0000 -- snip bind question -- And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE? I don't want to be picky, but asking bind questions on bind-specific mailing lists and not somewhere else is helpful to everybody. After all, someone else might have the same problem as you, and he/she probably won't search for bind-related problems on a FreeBSD list, thus not finding any helpful answers that might be given to you here. And no, the argument that your run your bind on a FreeBSD box doesn't count. That would be the same as asking a question about Photoshop in a Windows forum, just because you happen to run your Photoshop on a Windows box. And for all the people who answered this question, please don't do that anymore. The best thing, in my opinion, would be to privately ask the poster to repost to another, better suited mailing list. You can still be nice and answer the question, of course, but first advise the poster of where to ask next time. Minseok, please don't take this personal. I write similar messages every once in a while, this time it just happened to hit you. All I am trying to do is keeping the net a bit more sane. Thanks, Tobias