From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Nov 10 2:29:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from lists01.iafrica.com (lists01.iafrica.com [196.7.0.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D397E37B4CF for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:28:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwl.fw.uunet.co.za ([196.31.2.162]) by lists01.iafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2) id 13uBQK-0004Mu-00; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:28:44 +0200 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by nwl.fw.uunet.co.za (8.8.8/8.6.9) id MAA26373; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:28:50 +0200 (SAST) Received: by nwl.fw.uunet.co.za via recvmail id 26091; Fri Nov 10 12:28:10 2000 Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.fw.uunet.co.za) by axl.fw.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13uBPm-0006MY-00; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:28:10 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Matt Dillon Cc: Peter Wemm , Warner Losh , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The shared /bin and /sbin bikeshed In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:09:58 PST." <200011091909.eA9J9wM10639@earth.backplane.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:28:10 +0200 Message-ID: <24461.973852090@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:09:58 PST, Matt Dillon wrote: > I'd recommend against the linux /lib + /usr/lib model, it's a big > mess. I agree. In the kind of embedded system that Warner's doing all of this for, it seems to me that having binaries in /bin and /sbin linked against libraries in /usr/lib is no major transmash, since all three are more than likely to be on the same partition. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message