From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 30 05:05:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044E016A41F for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 05:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) Received: from pobox.codelabs.ru (pobox.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D4513C480 for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 05:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender:X-Spam-Status:Subject; b=hX9kHF4piyQLWbrqIpx+kYNE7m2QGhzRGXQgl6MRCotgIT0WcP5c2zfb+armqUrKyXj2bP689yqyN/SiTPQy+4hx5lCoz23jkLgGXVnIsRmdEcC5rpEa54OGWQfQqdd6VF+uwTY7OdsOsWUmfVMJPgM6Jlqa3WHqHG3//AKtS9I=; Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25]) by pobox.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1HtG7m-000DTV-Ux; Wed, 30 May 2007 08:49:31 +0400 Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:49:26 +0400 From: Eygene Ryabinkin To: rmgls@wanadoo.fr Message-ID: <20070530044926.GY35160@void.codelabs.ru> References: <20070529181027.65AD5700009C@mwinf2454.orange.fr> <20070530044614.GX35160@void.codelabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070530044614.GX35160@void.codelabs.ru> Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_20 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: direct I/O access X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 05:05:35 -0000 Me again. Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:46:14AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Then use i386_set_ioperm > that will be equivalent to the first parameter to the 'int 0x80' to > 0x04 instead 0x03. Hmm, that should read "set the first parameter for the 'int 0x80' to 0x04 instead of 0x03" -- it is much more understandable ;)) -- Eygene