From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  5 22:48:06 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F8D1065670;
	Tue,  5 Jun 2012 22:48:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org)
Received: from alto.onthenet.com.au (alto.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.68.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460D78FC0C;
	Tue,  5 Jun 2012 22:48:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dommail.onthenet.com.au (dommail.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.70.57])
	by alto.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE6C51268B;
	Wed,  6 Jun 2012 08:41:03 +1000 (EST)
Received: from 192-168-1-100.tpgi.com.au (110-174-216-99.static.tpgi.com.au
	[110.174.216.99]) by dommail.onthenet.com.au (MOS 4.2.4-GA)
	with ESMTP id BEH97495 (AUTH peterg@ptree32.com.au);
	Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:41:01 +1000
Message-ID: <4FCE8AF7.40606@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:40:55 +1000
From: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
X-Old-Subject: Re: KTR_SPAREx
References: <86bokyvtc2.fsf@ds4.des.no>	<CAJ-FndAMsoB1RAyS-Pa1JCv7W0qsviRxtShZ3uk_Tpd+J_EBaQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJ-FndAadYbqiWUTupXLEcRMkYYL50Ssehi8f8vv6YXvQzy4OA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJ-Vmo=F-=1UYcW0xBiNbjHa8CN7S=iDJ_bQDn4ESS3CumJf_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-FndAjcfd21xwYHPrSxgz32eHp2xTGRao1Kyqx4yBZTPD94A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndAjcfd21xwYHPrSxgz32eHp2xTGRao1Kyqx4yBZTPD94A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Junkmail: UCE(71)
X-Junkmail-Info: FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2, SPF_SOFTFAIL,
	TVD_RCVD_IP
X-Junkmail-Status: score=71/51, host=dommail.onthenet.com.au
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?YXY=?= <des@des.no>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
	=?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdy?=, arch@freebsd.org
Subject: {Spam?} Re: KTR_SPAREx
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:48:06 -0000

> We very much need an much higher granularity on KTR classes and
> possibly a way to use it on-the-fly for kernel development and I think
> what I suggested earlier makes sense.

  Anyone had a look at Dragonfly's ktr ?

    http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly.git/blob/HEAD:/sys/sys/ktr.h

later,

Peter.