From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 29 18:11:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B38BE1C; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:11:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651FA252; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hr17so102841wib.11 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:11:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pGstsxlt++69JTsme5A5BWUyVTLj7QmNC5gGhJTa0Nc=; b=ciQtHXbPlrSElLaBbsDYgagpwrHkOdMw2+Jja3PrgtVJZp35iMRK6LpreEuJTyWg3b Lp2+0yqRblB5hsWngCm0ukBcfrJCwUvxRCJqQHeKuJDEOpvcbVlzG/xMnwW7HKvr+Oz6 wCAzj562vSYywTR6HnsyYE21/LylcvYtZ2I/Y2igp/K3HzPXAaAhFfLYTR/5FL/e2ixD zTuBBoAoJmSM+QdBbicT1ujTt03nfFNhe8vjdnBIOu3PgZMMlk8nnLd5D0XRz/4P5vuT ICPFx5YcG9944pfoMcb0hhNZSDuvXl2PEFZX5kp0+J38eDhv3L7pu82nCUBCGfIJNSrl OvEg== X-Received: by 10.180.86.1 with SMTP id l1mr567980wiz.32.1364580705866; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:11:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:980:d7ed:1:64f2:5452:2b6d:45bd? ([2001:980:d7ed:1:64f2:5452:2b6d:45bd]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t7sm656721wij.2.2013.03.29.11.11.44 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= Message-ID: <5155D95E.9020803@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:11:42 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130309 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: signal 11 after kernel update r247742 -> r248706 References: <51545932.9050901@freebsd.org> <1364484652.36972.81.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <515466B5.4020403@freebsd.org> <5155BC1C.2000104@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: arm@freebsd.org, Ian Lepore X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:11:48 -0000 On 29-03-2013 18:58, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 29 March 2013 09:06, René Ladan > wrote: > > > >> I'm at r248509 on my rpi and everything is good; maybe that'll help > >> narrow the binary search. > > Ok, I'll start looking from there. > > The 'skeleton' unmapped IO commit was r248508, so that one is OK. > There seem to be some unmapped IO changes between r248509 and r248706, > (e.g. r248510-r248512, r248514-r248522, r248550, r248568-r248569, > r248596) but I think it is more related to something closer to > userland? > > But the other commits between r248508 and r248706 look OK to me > (including r248534 (jilles, SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONLBOCK, > MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC)) > > > Are you able to continue bisecting those changes? > I didn't try r248509 (which is OK for Ian) myself yet, I'll first build a kernel/world for that (but to be fair I'll first have to downgrade to r247742 again). René